Babes - Tips of Her Fingers starring Sasha Heart and Serena
363,583 99%
,jpeg/008/192/621/1280x720.2.jpg)
Babes - Tips of Her Fingers starring Sasha Heart and Serena Blair clip
6 years ago
,jpeg/021/032/450/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/011/769/126/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/010/007/519/1280x720.c.jpg.v1534341180)
,jpeg/007/477/003/v2/320x180.216.jpg)
,jpeg/011/957/000/v2/320x180.214.jpg)
,jpeg/007/409/529/v2/320x180.204.jpg)
,jpeg/021/959/561/1280x720.c.jpg.v1645847160)
,jpeg/012/117/727/1280x720.c.jpg.v1564436520)
,jpeg/021/743/695/1280x720.c.jpg.v1637869620)
,jpeg/009/697/149/v2/320x180.217.jpg)
,jpeg/021/522/730/1280x720.2.jpg)
Comments
11
My favourite is lesbian porn because it is so much more sensual. A man can never bring a woman to a resl orgasm unless he knows how to use his tongue. I love to see women orgasm, any girl i have been with always orgasms. I happily defer my orgasm until after my girl has cum, to be honest, id rather provide her with multiple orgadms and bring mysrlf off later just thinking of her cumming, reminding myself her taste by licking my lips.
A theory: could it be women think less about sex than men because half their sexuality is switched off, their natural position on the Kinsey scale distorted, skewed away from same-sex attraction?
Could it be a woman's thoughts of other women are naturally stronger and more intense, and blot out thoughts of men. Why? Could it be women's natural erotic tilt has always been innately sapphic? Have men deliberately interfered because THEY are selfish creatures driven by ego and social status? Have they manipulated social and religious institutions to artificially place themselves in societally-approved positions of authority? Do women know this on some level and deeply resent it and being denied "permission" to feel lust and act on these normal, wholesome cravings?
If THIS is true, would it follow lesbians and bisexual women think more about sex because homoerotic lust is "allowed" a freethinker, who is unhindered by unnecessary rules and encouraged to indulge visceral, animalistic lust only other women inspire?
Elsewhere, I said the hormone oxycotin is seldom released by women in male company, but a flood of it is when women congregate for social gatherings. Even polite hugs and kisses at a church bake sale, or at a game of bridge, releases this oxycotin "love hormone," and with it a rush of positive feelings, strengthening female bonds and perhaps stimulating desire for intimate physical contact, especially in a permissive, liberal environment.
Another question: is there something about lesbian porn which is in and of itself more intensely erotic, compared to straight porn? Many men, including myself, watch LP exclusively, but women? Surprisingly, results are the same because women perceive all-female couplings as gentler, more sensual, and more centered on female needs. A sapphic event lingers more in a oxycotin cloud and more slowly builds to the final, climatic release.
So, do homoerotic thoughts (for instance, of a woman's tongue snaking it's way up and down a shaved slit) spark more frequent imaginings, regardless of orientation?
My guess is, yes, LP is to vanilla porn as smoking an opiate is to injecting pure heroin. One may speculate.
If THAT'S true, a lesbian lifestyle would logically stimulate more frequent thoughts of sex; these thoughts would occasion more opportunities to indeed satisfy them?
Could it be a woman's thoughts of other women are naturally stronger and more intense, and blot out thoughts of men. Why? Could it be women's natural erotic tilt has always been innately sapphic? Have men deliberately interfered because THEY are selfish creatures driven by ego and social status? Have they manipulated social and religious institutions to artificially place themselves in societally-approved positions of authority? Do women know this on some level and deeply resent it and being denied "permission" to feel lust and act on these normal, wholesome cravings?
If THIS is true, would it follow lesbians and bisexual women think more about sex because homoerotic lust is "allowed" a freethinker, who is unhindered by unnecessary rules and encouraged to indulge visceral, animalistic lust only other women inspire?
Elsewhere, I said the hormone oxycotin is seldom released by women in male company, but a flood of it is when women congregate for social gatherings. Even polite hugs and kisses at a church bake sale, or at a game of bridge, releases this oxycotin "love hormone," and with it a rush of positive feelings, strengthening female bonds and perhaps stimulating desire for intimate physical contact, especially in a permissive, liberal environment.
Another question: is there something about lesbian porn which is in and of itself more intensely erotic, compared to straight porn? Many men, including myself, watch LP exclusively, but women? Surprisingly, results are the same because women perceive all-female couplings as gentler, more sensual, and more centered on female needs. A sapphic event lingers more in a oxycotin cloud and more slowly builds to the final, climatic release.
So, do homoerotic thoughts (for instance, of a woman's tongue snaking it's way up and down a shaved slit) spark more frequent imaginings, regardless of orientation?
My guess is, yes, LP is to vanilla porn as smoking an opiate is to injecting pure heroin. One may speculate.
If THAT'S true, a lesbian lifestyle would logically stimulate more frequent thoughts of sex; these thoughts would occasion more opportunities to indeed satisfy them?
